Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Savers Value Village, Inc.
How Savers Value Village, Inc. stacks up
SVV · against 361 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #211 of 362 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score26 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including SVV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger return on invested capital, but weaker return on assets than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 72% of peers. Return on assets: 1.2% vs peer median 3.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 7.7% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 61% of peers. Return on invested capital: 9.8% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SVV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SVV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 349 reported | 9.8% | 9.5% | 51% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 362 reported | 7.7% | 7.1% | 53% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 358 reported | 1.2% | 4.1% | 28% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 315 reported | 5.7% | 11.8% | 32% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 363 reported | 55.7% | 36.0% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SVV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 77 | |
| 1 | 11.3B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 1 | 6.8B USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 209 | 261.9B USD | 47 | 46 | |
| 211 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score