Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Mohawk Industries, Inc.
How Mohawk Industries, Inc. stacks up
MHK · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #859 of 1,604 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score160 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including MHK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 61% of peers. Operating margin: 4.7% vs peer median 6.4%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 7.8% vs peer median 7.3%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.7% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MHK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MHK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 7.8% | 7.3% | 52% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 4.7% | 6.4% | 39% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 3.7% | 3.3% | 54% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 5.5% | 7.7% | 40% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 25.6% | 30.2% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MHK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 859 | 616M EUR (≈$678M) | 46 | 40 | |
| 859 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score