Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Savers Value Village, Inc.
How Savers Value Village, Inc. stacks up
SVV · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Growth
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #211 of 356 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including SVV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 79% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -26.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.8% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 74% of peers. Revenue growth: 10.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SVV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SVV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 358 reported | 10.0% | 5.9% | 67% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 249 reported | -26.1% | 6.2% | 23% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 353 reported | 5.8% | 4.1% | 57% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SVV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 293M USD | 99 | 89 | |
| 211 | 395M USD | 49 | 40 | |
| 211 | 763M USD | 49 | 19 | |
| 211 | 7.5B USD | 49 | 48 | |
| 211 | 1.5B USD | 49 | 44 | |
| 211 | 1.4B USD | 49 | 38 | |
| 218 | 8.6B USD | 48 | 55 | |
| 218 | 2.4B USD | 48 | 65 | |
| 218 | 168M USD | 48 | 41 | |
| 218 | 2.6B USD | 48 | 49 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score