Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Suncor Energy Inc.
How Suncor Energy Inc. stacks up
SU · against 31 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #10 of 32 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score7 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including SU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 14.3% vs peer median 12.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.7% vs peer median 5.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.1% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | 7.0% | 6.3% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | 14.3% | 9.7% | 77% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 30 reported | 8.1% | 5.8% | 83% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 30 reported | 35.6% | 37.5% | 45% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 98 | 79 | |
| 2 | 108.0B USD | 79 | 55 | |
| 3 | 60.4B USD | 77 | 77 | |
| 4 | 135.8B USD | 76 | 60 | |
| 5 | 81.4B USD | 69 | 78 | |
| 6 | 56.7B USD | 63 | 57 | |
| 7 | 52.4B USD | 61 | 57 | |
| 8 | 120.0B USD | 59 | 62 | |
| 9 | 69.4B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 10 | 89.1B USD | 55 | 59 | |
| 11 | 934.4B HKD (≈$119.6B) | 54 | 58 | |
| 11 | 173.5B USD | 54 | 65 | |
| 13 | 122.6B USD | 52 | 32 | |
| 14 | 110.5B USD | 50 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score