Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ConocoPhillips
How ConocoPhillips stacks up
COP · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #177 of 387 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including COP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.4% vs peer median 5.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 6.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 14.0% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = COP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | COP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 5.2% | 5.8% | 47% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 14.2% | 12.4% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 5.8% | 6.0% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 37.7% | 60.0% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around COP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 173 | 3.8B USD | 55 | 65 | |
| 173 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score