Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to State Street Corporation
How State Street Corporation stacks up
STT · against 23 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #7 of 24 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including STT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.3% vs peer median 6.1%
- Cash exceeds market value plus debt, so EBITDA yield is not meaningful and is left out.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.4% vs peer median 5.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 27 reported | 6.7% | 3.8% | 73% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 18 reported | Not reported | 5.7% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 21 reported | 4.3% | 4.3% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 26 reported | 51.3% | 31.5% | 88% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.0B GBP (≈$33.9B) | 93 | 73 | |
| 2 | 43.8B USD | 74 | 57 | |
| 3 | 49.8B USD | 71 | 55 | |
| 4 | 24.1B USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 5 | 23.7B USD | 54 | 59 | |
| 6 | 31.1B USD | 53 | 65 | |
| 7 | 46.6B USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 8 | 67.1B USD | 47 | 51 | |
| 9 | 70.0B USD | 44 | 53 | |
| 10 | 477.0B HKD (≈$61.1B) | 43 | 60 | |
| 11 | 31.6B USD | 42 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score