Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
AMP · against 268 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #70 of 269 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including AMP · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
| Metric | AMP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 410 reported | 8.8% | 5.6% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 206 reported | Not reported | 6.8% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 183 reported | 16.7% | 6.1% | 75% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 401 reported | 11.6% | 83.1% | 9% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 82M USD | 99 | 78 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 67 | 13.0B EUR (≈$14.3B) | 75 | 66 | |
| 67 | 5.5B EUR (≈$6.0B) | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 55 |
| 67 | 82.3B THB (≈$2.3B) | 75 | 60 |
| 70 | 2.3B MYR (≈$514M) | 74 | 47 |
| 70 | 43.8B USD | 74 | 57 |
| 70 | 706M USD | 74 | 52 |
| 73 | 2.7B USD | 73 | 63 |
| 73 | 3.3B USD | 73 | 57 |
| 75 | 183.3B TWD (≈$5.7B) | 72 | 29 |