Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Strategic Education, Inc.
How Strategic Education, Inc. stacks up
STRA · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
80/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #157 of 799 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including STRA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 80?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.3% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 80% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.2% vs peer median 4.5%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 82% of peers. EBITDA yield: 15.8% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = STRA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | STRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 8.3% | 4.5% | 80% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 15.8% | 8.9% | 82% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 10.3% | 6.3% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 100.5% | 54.4% | 77% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around STRA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 157 | 129M EUR (≈$142M) | 80 | 37 | |
| 157 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score