Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NOMD · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #157 of 799 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including NOMD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
| Metric | NOMD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | 8.1% | 4.5% | 79% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 12.9% | 8.9% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 16.6% | 6.3% | 86% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 165.3% | 54.4% | 91% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 157 | 54.1B JPY (≈$368M) | 80 | 52 | |
| 157 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 425M NZD (≈$255M) |
| 80 |
| 76 |
| 157 | 129M EUR (≈$142M) | 80 | 37 |
| 157 | 446M EUR (≈$490M) | 80 | 73 |
| 157 | 1.7B USD | 80 | 42 |
| 157 | 6.5B USD | 80 | 51 |
| 157 | 1.6B USD | 80 | 65 |
| 157 | 36.93T IDR (≈$2.3B) | 80 | 86 |
| 165 | 67.3B HKD (≈$8.6B) | 79 | 59 |