Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SRG-PA · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #59 of 751 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 92
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)76 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including SRG-PA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SRG-PA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.17× | 0.82× | 88% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 2.19 | 0.69 | 1% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 6.17× | 1.20× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 55 | 132M HKD (≈$17M) | 93 | 24 | |
| 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 3.3B CNY (≈$467M) |
| 93 |
| 45 |
| 57 | Unavailable | 93 | 58 |
| 58 | 3.0B USD | 92 | 78 |
| 59 | Unavailable | 92 | 26 |
| 60 | 960M BRL (≈$173M) | 92 | 86 |
| 61 | 772M AUD (≈$509M) | 92 | 70 |
| 62 | 180M MYR (≈$40M) | 92 | 29 |
| 63 | 45.8B JPY (≈$311M) | 92 | 88 |