Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to SPS Commerce, Inc.
How SPS Commerce, Inc. stacks up
SPSC · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
61/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #264 of 479 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including SPSC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 64% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -1.0% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 9.8% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 80% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 16.2% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SPSC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SPSC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 9.8% | 13.1% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | -1.0% | 22.4% | 28% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 16.2% | 9.7% | 71% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SPSC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 264 | 2.6B USD | 61 | 24 | |
| 264 | 20.7B USD | 61 | 58 | |
| 264 | 2.7B USD | 61 | 54 | |
| 264 | 348M USD | 61 | 22 | |
| 264 | 3.1B USD | 61 | 68 | |
| 264 | 136.0B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 271 | 15.0B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 271 | 3.4B USD | 60 | 39 | |
| 271 | 203.8B USD | 60 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score