Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to CACI International Inc
How CACI International Inc stacks up
CACI · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
60/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #660 of 1,669 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including CACI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 60?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 6.7% vs peer median 11.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 10.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 73% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 12.6% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = CACI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | CACI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 10.9% | 8.5% | 58% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 6.7% | 11.1% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 12.6% | 4.8% | 73% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around CACI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 660 | 9.1B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 60 | 37 | |
| 660 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 60 | 49 | |
| 660 | 15.9B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 60 | 54 | |
| 660 | 9.9B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 60 | 58 | |
| 660 | 15.0B USD | 60 | 50 | |
| 660 | 3.4B USD | 60 | 39 | |
| 660 | 181.7B EUR (≈$199.8B) | 60 | 56 | |
| 660 | 203.8B USD | 60 | 56 | |
| 660 | 3.4B USD | 60 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score