Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Spotify Technology S.A.
How Spotify Technology S.A. stacks up
SPOT · against 142 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
25/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #113 of 143 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including SPOT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 25?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.6% vs peer median 8.6%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.0% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SPOT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SPOT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | 3.0% | 3.0% | 50% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 2.6% | 9.3% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | 3.0% | 7.5% | 28% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 7.7% | 45.9% | 16% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SPOT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 4.5B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 743M USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 393M USD | 96 | 78 | |
| 109 | 3.7B USD | 27 | 23 | |
| 111 | 22.0B USD | 26 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score