Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Formula One Group
How Formula One Group stacks up
FWONA · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
26/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #347 of 471 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including FWONA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 26?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.8% vs peer median 8.6%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.6% vs peer median 7.4%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.9% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FWONA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FWONA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | 0.9% | 3.0% | 37% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 3.8% | 8.7% | 29% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 3.6% | 7.6% | 30% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 34.6% | 48.9% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FWONA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 342 | 5.6B THB (≈$158M) | 27 | 45 | |
| 342 | 3.7B USD | 27 | 23 | |
| 342 | 14.7B SEK (≈$1.5B) | 27 | 57 | |
| 347 | 360.5B KRW (≈$260M) | 26 | 37 | |
| 347 | 22.0B USD | 26 | 54 | |
| 347 | 5.0B AUD (≈$3.3B) | 26 | 49 | |
| 347 | 2.0B CHF (≈$2.3B) | 26 | 34 | |
| 347 | 17M USD | 26 | 19 | |
| 352 | 24.0B USD | 25 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score