Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Roku, Inc.
How Roku, Inc. stacks up
ROKU · against 470 other Communication Services companies
Valuation
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #356 of 471 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score47 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including ROKU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 74% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.7% vs peer median 8.6%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 74% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.9% vs peer median 7.4%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.5% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ROKU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ROKU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 461 reported | 1.5% | 3.0% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 493 reported | 2.7% | 8.7% | 26% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 3.0% | 7.6% | 26% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 467 reported | 11.9% | 48.9% | 14% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ROKU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 105.8B KRW (≈$76M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 694.0B KRW (≈$500M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2.6B HKD (≈$329M) | 99 | 80 | |
| 3 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 226M SEK (≈$23M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 356 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 24 | 58 | |
| 356 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score