Ranked #743 of 751 · scores higher than 1% of peers · safety percentile 1
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
75 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including SPG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Higher relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 1 among Real Estate companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
▼more borrowing relative to shareholders' equity: weaker than 96% of peers. Debt / equity: 6.47× vs peer median 0.80×
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 89% of peers. Beta: 1.33 vs peer median 0.75
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 89% of peers. Current ratio: 0.27× vs peer median 1.20×
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SPG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd.2777.HK · Hong Kong
