Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SMMT · against 143 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #10 of 144 · scores higher than 94% of peers · safety percentile 89
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including SMMT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SMMT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 139 reported | 0.03× | 0.34× | 85% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 145 reported | -1.24 | 0.58 | 100% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 135 reported | 6.96× | 2.24× | 90% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 2 | 10.1B EUR (≈$11.1B) | 99 | ||
| 3 | 9.0B USD | 98 | 51 | |
| 4 | 10.2B USD | 97 | ||
| 5 | 9.8B USD | 96 | ||
| 6 | 8.8B USD | 94 | 50 | |
| 7 | 9.1B USD | 92 | 74 | |
| 8 | 7.7B USD | 92 | 36 | |
| 9 | 7.8B USD | 89 | 30 | |
| 10 | 12.6B USD | 89 | ||
| 11 | 9.0B USD | 87 | 78 | |
| 12 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 87 | ||
| 13 | 20.0B AUD (≈$13.2B) | 84 | 77 | |
| 14 | 49.0B CNY (≈$6.9B) | 82 | 60 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score