Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SMA · against 209 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #170 of 210 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 21
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)22 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including SMA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, which is weaker than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SMA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 208 reported | 0.89× | 0.83× | 43% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 204 reported | Not reported | 0.73 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 210 reported | 0.31× | 1.05× | 16% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 2 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2.4B USD | 94 | 52 | |
| 4 | 44.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 93 | 94 | |
| 5 | 180.1B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 93 | 77 | |
| 166 | 1.9B EUR (≈$2.1B) | 22 | 67 | |
| 167 | 477.5B JPY (≈$3.2B) | 22 | 42 | |
| 168 | 3.8B USD | 22 | 41 | |
| 169 | 11.0B DKK (≈$1.7B) | 22 | 49 | |
| 170 | 2.0B USD | 21 | 40 | |
| 171 | 3.5B USD | 21 | 59 | |
| 172 | 2.8B USD | 21 | 37 | |
| 173 | 28.2B CNY (≈$3.9B) | 21 | 31 | |
| 174 | 1.1B USD | 20 | 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score