Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SLB · against 31 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #13 of 32 · scores higher than 61% of peers · safety percentile 43
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)3 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including SLB · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SLB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 32 reported | 0.47× | 0.65× | 58% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 32 reported | 0.84 | 0.55 | 10% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 32 reported | 1.44× | 1.17× | 74% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.14T HKD (≈$146.3B) | 91 | 79 | |
| 2 | 81.4B USD | 79 | 78 | |
| 3 | 60.4B USD | 75 | 77 | |
| 4 | 83.6B USD | 70 | 41 | |
| 5 | 89.1B USD | 67 | 59 | |
| 9 | 66.8B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 10 | 56.7B USD | 53 | 57 | |
| 11 | 52.4B USD | 47 | 57 | |
| 12 | 433.8B BRL (≈$78.1B) | 46 | 41 | |
| 13 | 77.4B USD | 43 | 43 | |
| 14 | 53.9B USD | 39 | 42 | |
| 15 | 109.0B USD | 39 | 58 | |
| 16 | 135.8B USD | 38 | 60 | |
| 17 | 52.4B USD | 35 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score