Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
FANG · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #243 of 399 · scores higher than 39% of peers · safety percentile 39
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including FANG · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | FANG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 0.29× | 0.49× | 70% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.54 | 0.48 | 45% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 0.47× | 1.37× | 4% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 239 | 146M GBP (≈$189M) | 40 | 41 | |
| 240 | 1.1B USD | 40 | 55 | |
| 241 | 3.8B USD | 40 | 65 | |
| 242 | 3.1B CAD (≈$2.3B) | 39 | 62 | |
| 243 | 53.9B USD | 39 | 42 | |
| 244 | 109.0B USD | 39 | 58 | |
| 245 | 906M EUR (≈$997M) | 39 | 26 | |
| 246 | 13.0B HKD (≈$1.7B) | 38 | 23 | |
| 247 | 1.9B USD | 38 | 18 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score