Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SKYH · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #318 of 751 · scores higher than 58% of peers · safety percentile 58
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including SKYH · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity and beta than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SKYH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 3.71× | 0.82× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.30 | 0.69 | 12% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 3.38× | 1.20× | 87% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 314 | 71.4B THB (≈$2.0B) | 58 | 54 | |
| 315 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 5.6B USD |
| 58 |
| 56 |
| 316 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 58 | 63 |
| 317 | 146.6B JPY (≈$997M) | 58 | 54 |
| 318 | 822M USD | 58 | 42 |
| 319 | 1.1B CHF (≈$1.3B) | 58 | 46 |
| 320 | 8.2B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 57 | 18 |
| 321 | 182M BRL (≈$33M) | 57 | 75 |
| 322 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 57 | 21 |