Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SIMO · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #819 of 1,698 · scores higher than 52% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including SIMO · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SIMO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.07× | 0.26× | 73% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.70 | 0.84 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 2.52× | 1.83× | 68% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 815 | 466M SEK (≈$47M) | 52 | 76 | |
| 816 | 470.4B JPY (≈$3.2B) | 52 | 66 | |
| 817 | 17.0B TWD (≈$528M) | 52 | 71 | |
| 818 | 691.4B TWD (≈$21.4B) | 52 | 59 | |
| 819 | 6.8B USD | 52 | 52 | |
| 820 | 1.4B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 52 | 61 | |
| 821 | 3.2B SEK (≈$323M) | 52 | 35 | |
| 822 | 671M USD | 52 | 31 | |
| 823 | 1.2B USD | 52 | 25 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score