Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
How Silicon Motion Technology Corporation stacks up
SIMO · against 1,707 other Technology companies
Profitability
72/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #471 of 1,708 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score171 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including SIMO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 72?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 64% of peers. Return on invested capital: 11.7% vs peer median 6.8%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 65% of peers. Operating margin: 10.5% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 86% of peers. Return on assets: 10.0% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SIMO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SIMO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,598 reported | 11.7% | 6.8% | 64% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 10.5% | 6.3% | 65% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,668 reported | 10.0% | 2.9% | 86% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,633 reported | 31.6% | 7.5% | 91% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,712 reported | 48.9% | 33.4% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SIMO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 3 | 561.7B CNY (≈$78.6B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 471 | 791M USD | 72 | 64 | |
| 471 | 2.7B AUD (≈$1.8B) | 72 | 49 | |
| 471 | 195.0B BRL (≈$35.1B) | 72 | 73 | |
| 471 | 28.5B USD | 72 | 50 | |
| 471 | 6.8B USD | 72 | 52 | |
| 471 | 19.0B USD | 72 | 54 | |
| 471 | 10.6B USD | 72 | 68 | |
| 488 | 45.9B CNY (≈$6.4B) | 71 | 73 | |
| 488 | 4.3B HKD (≈$545M) | 71 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score