Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SHO · against 199 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Ranked #4 of 200 · scores higher than 98% of peers · safety percentile 94
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including SHO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SHO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 198 reported | 0.52× | 0.81× | 79% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 195 reported | 0.98 | 0.78 | 31% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 200 reported | 5.43× | 1.03× | 95% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2.5B USD | 97 | 88 | |
| 3 | 3.3B USD | 97 | 78 | |
| 4 | 2.4B USD | 94 | 52 | |
| 5 | 44.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 93 | 94 | |
| 6 | 180.1B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 93 | 77 | |
| 7 | 1.8B USD | 93 | 60 | |
| 8 | 3.0B USD | 92 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score