Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SFD · against 118 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #17 of 119 · scores higher than 86% of peers · safety percentile 80
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including SFD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio, which is stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SFD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 119 reported | 0.33× | 0.46× | 57% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 115 reported | Not reported | 0.31 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 112 reported | 2.56× | 1.52× | 83% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 2 | 1.06T JPY (≈$7.2B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 3 | 58.1B CNY (≈$8.1B) | 94 | 39 | |
| 4 | 37.3B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 5 | 1.68T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 91 | 64 | |
| 13 | 1.77T JPY (≈$12.0B) | 82 | 57 | |
| 14 | 1.14T INR (≈$13.7B) | 82 | 71 | |
| 15 | 599.0B JPY (≈$4.1B) | 80 | 50 | |
| 16 | 826.9B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 80 | 49 | |
| 17 | 7.2B USD | 80 | 72 | |
| 18 | 629.6B JPY (≈$4.3B) | 79 | 56 | |
| 19 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 79 | 76 | |
| 19 | 5.5B USD | 79 | 84 | |
| 21 | 13.7B USD | 78 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score