Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Southern Copper Corporation
How Southern Copper Corporation stacks up
SCCO · against 11 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Valuation
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #8 of 12 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SCCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.6% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.8% vs peer median 3.6%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.4% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SCCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SCCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | 3.8% | 4.3% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | 6.6% | 10.5% | 36% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 7 reported | 3.4% | 3.4% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 12 reported | 8.3% | 23.4% | 9% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SCCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 725.9B HKD (≈$92.9B) | 87 | 71 | |
| 2 | 113.2B USD | 82 | 86 | |
| 3 | 132.7B USD | 75 | 64 | |
| 4 | 198.6B USD | 74 | 70 | |
| 5 | 1.75T MXN (≈$94.4B) | 68 | 79 | |
| 6 | 84.6B USD | 67 | 82 | |
| 7 | 88.7B USD | 49 | 63 | |
| 8 | 149.9B USD | 46 | 76 | |
| 9 | 82.7B USD | 41 | 45 | |
| 10 | 116.5B EUR (≈$128.2B) | 39 | 47 | |
| 11 | 235.8B USD | 38 | 51 | |
| 12 | 85.4B USD | 34 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score