Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Sherwin-Williams Company
How The Sherwin-Williams Company stacks up
SHW · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #774 of 1,321 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including SHW · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 68% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.2% vs peer median 3.6%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.9% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SHW, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SHW | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 3.2% | 3.8% | 46% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 4.9% | 8.6% | 32% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 3.9% | 2.6% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 4.7% | 61.0% | 2% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SHW| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 774 | Unavailable | 41 | 50 | |
| 774 | 207.4B INR (≈$2.5B) | 41 | 54 | |
| 774 | 1.12T INR (≈$13.5B) | 41 | 48 | |
| 774 | 15.0B USD | 41 | 24 | |
| 774 | 82.7B USD | 41 | 45 | |
| 774 | 36.9B USD | 41 | 52 | |
| 787 | 10.5B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 40 | 48 | |
| 787 | 3.2B CNY (≈$452M) | 40 | 46 | |
| 787 | 47.8B CNY (≈$6.7B) | 40 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score