Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Linde plc
How Linde plc stacks up
LIN · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #813 of 1,321 · scores higher than 38% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including LIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Basic Materials peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 65% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.1% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.1% vs peer median 3.6%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.1% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LIN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 3.0% | 3.8% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 5.3% | 8.6% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 2.1% | 2.6% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 16.6% | 61.0% | 8% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LIN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 813 | 26.6B TWD (≈$823M) | 38 | 59 | |
| 813 | 3.6B CNY (≈$500M) | 38 | 38 | |
| 813 | 1.3B AUD (≈$859M) | 38 | 59 | |
| 813 | 3.2B USD | 38 | 57 | |
| 813 | 235.8B USD | 38 | 51 | |
| 813 | 1.3B AUD (≈$862M) | 38 | 39 | |
| 813 | 19.6B USD | 38 | 76 | |
| 827 | 81.3B CNY (≈$11.4B) | 37 | 52 | |
| 827 | 4.2B CNY (≈$591M) | 37 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score