Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SANM · against 250 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #203 of 251 · scores higher than 19% of peers · safety percentile 17
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)31 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SANM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SANM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 242 reported | 0.88× | 0.33× | 18% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 238 reported | 1.60 | 1.00 | 17% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 250 reported | 1.78× | 1.67× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 2 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 3 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 4 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 5 | 40.0B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 199 | 155.5B TWD (≈$4.8B) | 18 | 33 | |
| 200 | 5.6B USD | 18 | 20 | |
| 201 | 9.3B USD | 18 | 59 | |
| 202 | 4.9B USD | 18 | 46 | |
| 203 | 8.8B USD | 17 | 57 | |
| 204 | 5.3B EUR (≈$5.8B) | 17 | 47 | |
| 205 | 8.6B USD | 17 | 54 | |
| 206 | 6.3B USD | 16 | 63 | |
| 207 | 40.9B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 15 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score