Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
LYFT · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,431 of 1,698 · scores higher than 16% of peers · safety percentile 16
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including LYFT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | LYFT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.43× | 0.26× | 38% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.96 | 0.84 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 0.59× | 1.83× | 2% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,427 | 693M CHF (≈$797M) | 16 | 39 | |
| 1,428 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 161.4B CNY (≈$22.6B) |
| 16 |
| 43 |
| 1,429 | 1.9B USD | 16 | 59 |
| 1,430 | 11.9B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 16 | 33 |
| 1,431 | 6.3B USD | 16 | 63 |
| 1,432 | 2.3B CNY (≈$329M) | 16 | 33 |
| 1,433 | 17.8B USD | 16 | 25 |
| 1,434 | 6.0B HKD (≈$767M) | 16 | 45 |
| 1,435 | 20.7B USD | 15 | 58 |