Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lyft, Inc.
How Lyft, Inc. stacks up
LYFT · against 1,707 other Technology companies
Profitability
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #659 of 1,708 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score171 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including LYFT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 79% of peers. Return on invested capital: -3.2% vs peer median 6.8%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 78% of peers. Operating margin: -1.8% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 99% of peers. Return on assets: 31.5% vs peer median 2.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LYFT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LYFT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,598 reported | -3.2% | 6.8% | 21% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,698 reported | -1.8% | 6.3% | 22% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,668 reported | 31.5% | 2.9% | 99% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,633 reported | 152.6% | 7.5% | 100% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,712 reported | 38.0% | 33.4% | 56% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LYFT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 3 | 561.7B CNY (≈$78.6B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 659 | 16.7B TWD (≈$516M) | 61 | 60 | |
| 659 | 6.44T JPY (≈$43.8B) | 61 | 63 | |
| 659 | 246.9B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 61 | 75 | |
| 659 | 96M EUR (≈$105M) | 61 | 54 | |
| 659 | 6.3B USD | 61 | 63 | |
| 659 | 1.8B USD | 61 | 51 | |
| 659 | 652M USD | 61 | 57 | |
| 659 | 1.9B USD | 61 | 42 | |
| 659 | 4.2B SGD (≈$3.2B) | 61 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score