Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
SANM · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,402 of 1,698 · scores higher than 17% of peers · safety percentile 17
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including SANM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | SANM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.88× | 0.26× | 18% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.60 | 0.84 | 13% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.78× | 1.83× | 48% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,398 | 2.2B USD | 18 | 44 | |
| 1,399 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 200.9B INR (≈$2.4B) |
| 18 |
| 57 |
| 1,400 | 4.9B USD | 18 | 46 |
| 1,401 | 1.9B HKD (≈$249M) | 18 | 35 |
| 1,402 | 8.8B USD | 17 | 57 |
| 1,403 | 8.8B SEK (≈$880M) | 17 | 40 |
| 1,404 | 1.8B USD | 17 | 44 |
| 1,405 | 2.2B USD | 17 | 30 |
| 1,406 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.5B) | 17 | 57 |