Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RUSHA · against 284 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #110 of 285 · scores higher than 62% of peers · safety percentile 55
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)33 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including RUSHA · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RUSHA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 275 reported | 0.63× | 0.56× | 46% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 277 reported | 0.88 | 0.84 | 47% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 273 reported | 1.45× | 1.49× | 47% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 404.1B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 97 | 80 | |
| 3 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 4 | 480.8B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 96 | 75 | |
| 5 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 106 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 57 | 61 | |
| 107 | 1.00T JPY (≈$6.8B) | 56 | 77 | |
| 108 | 681.8B JPY (≈$4.6B) | 56 | 50 | |
| 109 | 7.5B EUR (≈$8.2B) | 55 | 40 | |
| 110 | 5.2B USD | 55 | 50 | |
| 111 | 5.7B USD | 55 | 77 | |
| 112 | 26.9B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 55 | 84 | |
| 113 | 4.5B AUD (≈$3.0B) | 55 | 54 | |
| 114 | 58.7B HKD (≈$7.5B) | 54 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score