Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Regal Rexnord Corporation
How Regal Rexnord Corporation stacks up
RRX · against 2,399 other Industrials companies
Growth
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,093 of 2,400 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score240 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including RRX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 73% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 29.0% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RRX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RRX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 2,422 reported | 3.5% | 4.4% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,764 reported | 29.0% | 7.1% | 73% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 2,385 reported | 2.9% | 4.2% | 44% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RRX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 9.4B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 74.1B TWD (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 22.5B NOK (≈$2.1B) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,093 | 3.6B USD | 54 | 51 | |
| 1,093 | 3.32T INR (≈$39.8B) | 54 | 53 | |
| 1,093 | 249M CHF (≈$287M) | 54 | 77 | |
| 1,093 | 13.5B DKK (≈$2.0B) | 54 | 56 | |
| 1,093 | 12.0B USD | 54 | 48 | |
| 1,093 | 51.1B SEK (≈$5.1B) | 54 | 57 | |
| 1,093 | 19.0B EUR (≈$20.9B) | 54 | 56 | |
| 1,093 | 162M USD | 54 | 42 | |
| 1,117 | 173.2B CNY (≈$24.2B) | 53 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score