Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RPM International Inc.
How RPM International Inc. stacks up
RPM · against 1,274 other Basic Materials companies
Growth
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #581 of 1,275 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score128 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including RPM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 0.7% vs peer median 9.4%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.0% vs peer median 3.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.8% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RPM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RPM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,289 reported | 6.0% | 3.4% | 58% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 826 reported | 0.7% | 9.4% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,263 reported | 2.8% | -0.0% | 60% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RPM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 2.29T ARS (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 97.93T IDR (≈$6.1B) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 1.4B CAD (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 581 | 373.9B JPY (≈$2.5B) | 54 | 60 | |
| 581 | 10.8B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 54 | 44 | |
| 581 | 6.2B CNY (≈$874M) | 54 | 70 | |
| 581 | 7.4B EUR (≈$8.1B) | 54 | 75 | |
| 581 | 13.4B USD | 54 | 52 | |
| 581 | 4.2B AUD (≈$2.8B) | 54 | 44 | |
| 581 | 82.7B USD | 54 | 45 | |
| 581 | 10.3B USD | 54 | 68 | |
| 581 | 768M USD | 54 | 80 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score