Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RPM International Inc.
How RPM International Inc. stacks up
RPM · against 128 other Basic Materials companies of similar size
Growth
54/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #81 of 129 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including RPM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 0.7% vs peer median 9.4%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.0% vs peer median 3.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.8% vs peer median -0.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RPM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RPM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 129 reported | 6.0% | 9.2% | 42% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 105 reported | 0.7% | 17.9% | 28% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 128 reported | 2.8% | 3.0% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RPM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 8.9B USD | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 11.9B CAD (≈$8.7B) | 99 | 80 | |
| 4 | 12.0B AUD (≈$8.0B) | 99 | 74 | |
| 77 | 54.2B SAR (≈$14.6B) | 55 | 77 | |
| 77 | 23.0B USD | 55 | 54 | |
| 77 | 123.5B BRL (≈$22.2B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 81 | 7.4B EUR (≈$8.1B) | 54 | 75 | |
| 81 | 13.4B USD | 54 | 52 | |
| 81 | 10.3B USD | 54 | 68 | |
| 84 | 128.4B NOK (≈$12.2B) | 51 | 73 | |
| 85 | 91.4B CNY (≈$12.8B) | 50 | 31 | |
| 86 | 2.19T JPY (≈$14.9B) | 49 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score