Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ranger Energy Services, Inc.
How Ranger Energy Services, Inc. stacks up
RNGR · against 193 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #48 of 194 · scores higher than 74% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score24 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including RNGR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 4.3% vs peer median 5.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.0% vs peer median 6.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 20.7% vs peer median 12.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RNGR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RNGR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 189 reported | 4.3% | 5.2% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 20.7% | 11.9% | 80% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 184 reported | 7.1% | 5.9% | 62% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 190 reported | 92.1% | 50.6% | 83% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RNGR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 98 | 55 | |
| 3 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 254M USD | 96 | 88 | |
| 5 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 46 | 3.4B USD | 70 | 62 | |
| 46 | 318M USD | 70 | 44 | |
| 48 | 81.4B USD | 69 | 78 | |
| 48 | 6.8B USD | 69 | 70 | |
| 48 | 328M USD | 69 | 54 | |
| 48 | 297.1B USD | 69 | 53 | |
| 52 | 3.6B USD | 68 | 77 | |
| 53 | 3.7B USD | 66 | 67 | |
| 53 | 4.3B USD | 66 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score