Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TGS · against 386 other Energy companies
Ranked #123 of 387 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including TGS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
| Metric | TGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 9.4% | 5.8% | 75% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 22.1% | 12.4% | 82% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 6.6% | 6.0% | 55% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 61.1% | 60.0% | 51% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 119 | 297.1B USD | 69 | 53 | |
| 123 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 87.1B CNY (≈$12.2B) |
| 68 |
| 66 |
| 123 | 18.6B THB (≈$522M) | 68 | 61 |
| 123 | 1.4B CAD (≈$986M) | 68 | 67 |
| 123 | 3.6B USD | 68 | 77 |
| 127 | 19.2B MYR (≈$4.2B) | 67 | 72 |
| 127 | 25.0B NOK (≈$2.4B) | 67 | 57 |
| 127 | 16.2B THB (≈$453M) | 67 | 45 |
| 127 | 22.6B CAD (≈$16.5B) | 67 | 66 |