Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RingCentral, Inc.
How RingCentral, Inc. stacks up
RNG · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
61/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #643 of 1,667 · scores higher than 61% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score166 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including RNG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 61?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 1.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 86% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 8.8% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RNG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RNG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | 1.6% | 2.3% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 5.3% | 4.3% | 57% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 8.8% | 2.7% | 86% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | -9.3% | 33.4% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RNG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 643 | 6.2B USD | 61 | 66 | |
| 643 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score