Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to RingCentral, Inc.
How RingCentral, Inc. stacks up
RNG · against 1,707 other Technology companies
Profitability
79/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #351 of 1,708 · scores higher than 79% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score171 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including RNG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 79?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 4.8% vs peer median 6.3%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 80% of peers. Return on assets: 7.9% vs peer median 2.9%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 90% of peers. Return on invested capital: 34.8% vs peer median 6.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RNG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RNG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,598 reported | 34.8% | 6.8% | 90% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 4.8% | 6.3% | 43% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,668 reported | 7.9% | 2.9% | 80% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,633 reported | Not reported | 7.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,712 reported | 71.9% | 33.4% | 89% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RNG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.8B AUD (≈$3.2B) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 604M AUD (≈$399M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 3 | 561.7B CNY (≈$78.6B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 351 | 24.7B SEK (≈$2.5B) | 79 | 56 | |
| 351 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 79 | 60 | |
| 351 | 1.6B USD | 79 | 72 | |
| 351 | 1.4B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 79 | 61 | |
| 351 | 6.5B USD | 79 | 48 | |
| 351 | 4.9B USD | 79 | 50 | |
| 369 | 14.4B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 78 | 59 | |
| 369 | 4.3B CNY (≈$597M) | 78 | 74 | |
| 369 | 7.8B TWD (≈$242M) | 78 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score