Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RMR · against 750 other Real Estate companies
Ranked #436 of 751 · scores higher than 42% of peers · safety percentile 42
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)75 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including RMR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Real Estate peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RMR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 733 reported | 0.46× | 0.82× | 74% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 742 reported | 1.07 | 0.69 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 751 reported | 1.40× | 1.20× | 57% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 100 | 42 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 100 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.7B THB (≈$47M) | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7.71T IDR (≈$478M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 5 | 2.0B HKD (≈$257M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 432 | 1.3B SGD (≈$961M) | 43 | 62 | |
| 433 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 16.1B HKD (≈$2.1B) |
| 42 |
| 37 |
| 434 | 219M SGD (≈$167M) | 42 | 32 |
| 435 | 936M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 42 | 62 |
| 436 | 284M USD | 42 | 57 |
| 437 | 201M GBP (≈$261M) | 42 | 53 |
| 438 | 149.4B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 42 | 50 |
| 439 | 6.3B AUD (≈$4.2B) | 42 | 66 |
| 440 | 2.3B BRL (≈$406M) | 41 | 77 |