Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RMBS · against 250 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #16 of 251 · scores higher than 94% of peers · safety percentile 93
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including RMBS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RMBS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 243 reported | 0.01× | 0.33× | 91% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 239 reported | 1.87 | 1.02 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 250 reported | 9.75× | 1.69× | 97% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 3 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 4 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 5 | 40.0B CNY (≈$5.6B) | 97 | 82 | |
| 12 | 51.2B CNY (≈$7.2B) | 94 | 62 | |
| 13 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 14 | 8.0B USD | 94 | 51 | |
| 15 | 10.7B USD | 93 | 59 | |
| 16 | 9.6B USD | 93 | 75 | |
| 17 | 6.5B USD | 92 | 38 | |
| 18 | 8.3B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 19 | 12.2B USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 20 | 7.4B USD | 91 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score