Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Radiant Logistics, Inc.
How Radiant Logistics, Inc. stacks up
RLGT · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
34/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #339 of 446 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including RLGT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 34?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 82% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -4.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.2% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RLGT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RLGT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | 3.5% | 8.4% | 29% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | 9.2% | 9.2% | 50% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | -4.9% | 5.2% | 12% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RLGT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 339 | 2.5B USD | 34 | 33 | |
| 339 | 12.0B USD | 34 | 53 | |
| 339 | 6.6B USD | 34 | 52 | |
| 339 | 613M USD | 34 | ||
| 339 | 441M USD | 34 | 45 | |
| 339 | 8.0B USD | 34 | 48 | |
| 347 | 479M USD | 33 | 42 | |
| 347 | 10.4B USD | 33 | 48 | |
| 347 | 410M USD | 33 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score