Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RIO · against 1,354 other Basic Materials companies
Ranked #677 of 1,355 · scores higher than 50% of peers · safety percentile 50
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)136 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including RIO · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RIO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,322 reported | 0.32× | 0.36× | 54% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,325 reported | 0.66 | 0.66 | 50% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,285 reported | 1.42× | 1.77× | 36% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.3B INR (≈$316M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 226M USD | 100 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.4B CNY (≈$902M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 17.3B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 44 | |
| 673 | 53.6B JPY (≈$365M) | 50 | 54 | |
| 674 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 95.7B SEK (≈$9.6B) |
| 50 |
| 55 |
| 675 | 5.8B CNY (≈$819M) | 50 | 44 |
| 676 | 8.9B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 50 | 48 |
| 677 | 132.7B USD | 50 | 64 |
| 678 | 55.3B JPY (≈$376M) | 50 | 55 |
| 679 | 264.1B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 50 | 51 |
| 680 | 150.6B JPY (≈$1.0B) | 50 | 57 |
| 681 | 325M GBP (≈$423M) | 50 | 37 |