Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Rio Tinto Group
How Rio Tinto Group stacks up
RIO · against 1,274 other Basic Materials companies
Growth
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #683 of 1,275 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score127 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including RIO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 70% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -13.7% vs peer median 9.4%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 0.9% vs peer median -0.0%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 6.3% vs peer median 3.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RIO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RIO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,289 reported | 6.3% | 3.4% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 826 reported | -13.7% | 9.4% | 30% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,263 reported | 0.9% | -0.0% | 54% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RIO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64.1B CNY (≈$9.0B) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 2.29T ARS (≈$2.3B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 97.93T IDR (≈$6.1B) | 100 | 47 | |
| 1 | 13.8B USD | 100 | 83 | |
| 1 | 1.4B CAD (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 79 | |
| 683 | 62.9B CNY (≈$8.8B) | 46 | 23 | |
| 683 | 4.9B EUR (≈$5.3B) | 46 | 69 | |
| 683 | 986M USD | 46 | 59 | |
| 683 | 18.79T IDR (≈$1.2B) | 46 | 66 | |
| 683 | 132.7B USD | 46 | 64 | |
| 683 | 964.1B INR (≈$11.6B) | 46 | 74 | |
| 696 | 11.1B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 45 | 64 | |
| 696 | 56.1B CNY (≈$7.9B) | 45 | 66 | |
| 696 | 1.4B HKD (≈$184M) | 45 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score