Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
RAMP · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #587 of 1,698 · scores higher than 65% of peers · safety percentile 65
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)169 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including RAMP · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | RAMP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.03× | 0.26× | 81% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.25 | 0.84 | 26% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 2.66× | 1.83× | 70% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 583 | 641.0B JPY (≈$4.4B) | 66 | 70 | |
| 584 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 10.3B TWD (≈$319M) |
| 66 |
| 58 |
| 585 | 5.6B CNY (≈$781M) | 66 | 42 |
| 586 | 3.5B CNY (≈$494M) | 66 | 28 |
| 587 | 2.3B USD | 65 | 79 |
| 588 | 14.5B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 65 | 35 |
| 589 | 54.5B JPY (≈$371M) | 65 | 68 |
| 590 | 1.4B USD | 65 | 55 |
| 591 | 4.5B CNY (≈$633M) | 65 | 35 |