Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
How LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. stacks up
RAMP · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
95/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #77 of 1,669 · scores higher than 95% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score175 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including RAMP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 95?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.9% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 69% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.0% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 98% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 1080.8% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RAMP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RAMP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 8.9% | 8.5% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | 1080.8% | 11.1% | 98% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 11.0% | 4.8% | 69% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RAMP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 77 | 207.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 77 | 259.7B USD | 95 | 63 | |
| 77 | 2.3B USD | 95 | 67 | |
| 77 | 1.4B USD | 95 | 33 | |
| 77 | 2.3B USD | 95 | 79 | |
| 77 | 6.2B SEK (≈$619M) | 95 | 37 | |
| 77 | 1.5B USD | 95 | 77 | |
| 93 | 6.3B CNY (≈$883M) | 94 | 45 | |
| 93 | 9.7B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 94 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score