Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ferrari N.V.
How Ferrari N.V. stacks up
RACE · against 40 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #21 of 41 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including RACE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.9% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: 7.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.9% vs peer median 4.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = RACE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | RACE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 41 reported | 7.0% | 8.2% | 40% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 36 reported | 5.9% | 3.7% | 57% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 41 reported | 11.9% | 9.9% | 57% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around RACE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 3 | 38.3B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 4 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 5 | 4.05T INR (≈$48.6B) | 97 | 53 | |
| 17 | 117.0B USD | 72 | 56 | |
| 18 | 678.2B CNY (≈$94.9B) | 70 | 69 | |
| 19 | 52.8B USD | 68 | 52 | |
| 20 | 659.6B HKD (≈$84.4B) | 67 | 72 | |
| 21 | 72.8B USD | 66 | 62 | |
| 22 | 72.8B USD | 64 | 50 | |
| 23 | 81.9B USD | 62 | 45 | |
| 24 | 5.71T JPY (≈$38.8B) | 61 | 82 | |
| 24 | 39.3B USD | 61 | 53 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score