Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
QBTS · against 376 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #30 of 377 · scores higher than 92% of peers · safety percentile 91
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)34 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including QBTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | QBTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 363 reported | 0.04× | 0.29× | 81% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 363 reported | 2.14 | 0.98 | 6% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 373 reported | 20.55× | 1.85× | 99% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 2 | 32.0B CNY (≈$4.5B) | 100 | 75 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 3.5B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 26 | 14.4B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 94 | 59 | |
| 27 | 3.2B USD | 93 | 45 | |
| 28 | 6.5B USD | 92 | 38 | |
| 29 | 2.2B USD | 91 | 27 | |
| 30 | 3.9B USD | 91 | 36 | |
| 31 | 3.4B USD | 91 | 52 | |
| 32 | 7.4B USD | 91 | 42 | |
| 33 | 2.1B USD | 91 | 52 | |
| 34 | 2.1B USD | 91 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score