Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Qnity Electronics, Inc.
How Qnity Electronics, Inc. stacks up
Q · against 496 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #229 of 497 · scores higher than 53% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score55 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including Q · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.5% vs peer median 2.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.3% vs peer median 2.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.6% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = Q, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | Q | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 495 reported | 2.4% | 1.9% | 56% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 499 reported | 5.3% | 4.0% | 60% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 3.3% | 3.3% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 490 reported | 29.2% | 22.1% | 59% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around Q| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 5 | 662M USD | 98 | 57 | |
| 223 | 47.7B USD | 52 | 58 | |
| 229 | 2.1B USD | 51 | 64 | |
| 229 | 4.5B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 229 | 406.0B USD | 51 | 54 | |
| 229 | 24.9B USD | 51 | 48 | |
| 233 | 2.3B USD | 50 | 60 | |
| 233 | 1.9B USD | 50 | 29 | |
| 233 | 536M USD | 50 | 34 | |
| 233 | 45.7B USD | 50 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score